I have no actual paper, this 'll suffice.

I can't doodle on this shit either, except with words, and that isn't
really that fun.

THINGS TO ASK
1. why the repetition/2 wave packets? z-runs
2. how is mean file arranged? what is in there? amp run
3. wrap around in x? f05 - u
4. f12 - u - tstep 1 and 2 and 'a'

RUNS TO DO:
- modeled on f01, make a run w/ timesteps of 1 on a 250x250 grid.
	And do one on a 500x500 grid just to be sure.  And a 300x300.
	PURPOSE: ascertain prop. direction.  So timmax can be like 20
	j01,j02,j03
- modeled on f02, do a run specifying ry=5.0
	PURPOSE: funky run; want to make sure that the packet IS 
	centered.  
	j04
- t09.  fo sho
	j05
- f10 and f11, but WITH AN AMPLITUDE
	j06=f10, j07=f11
- f10 and f11, but with smaller time steps
	j08=f10, j09=f11
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
d's - Forget exactly what these were for; playing w/ stddev and x0/z0/code.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
d01; neat.  shows that I can set x0.  I don't know the codein :\  Idiot.
d02; failed attempt to get rx/ry to be x0/z0.  Decent example of 2
	wavepackets where I want one.
d03; meh - moves x0.  s'about it
d04; kinda neat; moves x0 and has WAVESTDEV2 = 1
d05; companion to d05; WAVESTDEV2 = .1
d06; not sure if meaningful, but REALLY NEAT.  WAVESTDEV2=0.005
d07; d04 w/ WAVESTDEV = 1. not .1 so that I can see what '1' means.  The
	WAVESTDEV2 = 1. and that hardly covers all of x.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
f's - These are reruns of the s's, but with 500x500 points instead
	of 1000x1000
      No f run has amp > .2
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
f01; zmax2=0.; tzr=1, stddev=1.  Pretty frick'n dull run
f02; neat early edge effects; not really interesting overall though.
	wavestdev=.1
f03; neat run.  Show Joe.  Same as f01 but Zmax2=2, not 0.  Shouldn't 
	make a difference, but it does.  Probably because of the way
	that z0 is defined.  AND, they are different by more than
	a vertical displacement.
     OH, and the wind profile/contour is really sweet too.
f04; meh. some kh-y stuff?  by 40 the t profile (mean inc) is 
	pretty flat, though actually I think it starts that way.
f05; neat shit but not good - wrap around effects? devz=.1, devz=1.
f06; stdevz = 2; not interesting.
f07; neat for reflections, run for first x envelope
f08; meh
f09; looks the same as f07. not SO bad as freqovern=1
f10; u plot is odd. 
f11; freqovern = .5, yet f11 = f10, 13 vs. 30. Hmm.
f12; u > t this time.  severe wrap around fx.  The x constraint of .1 
	almost seems weaker than the same z constraint. Again, f/n = .5
f13; meh; same as f12.
f14; at least 13 and 14 are different.  f/n = 1 here
f15; meh
f16; interesting diff between t=1 and t=2.  Other than that, not so much.
	zmx2=0, tzr=1, stddev=2
f17; pretty similar to 16; stddevz=10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
t's - These are done with a 500x500 grid, but with ntotal = nstep*.  This
	results in 2 timesteps being produced.  Definitely look at these
	since one of them I DEFINITELY want to run fully
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
t07; mildly interesting.  xmax = 100.
t09; OMGZ!!!!  Crazy shit everywhere!
t0?; Pretty uninteresting basically.